Restitution order in lieu of revoking the license may be issued under what circumstance?

Restitution order in lieu of revoking the license may be issued under what circumstance?

• A. Yes, as described
• B. No, not allowed
• C. Only with court approval
• D. Only for minor violations

Answer: (A)

The situation allows a restitution order in place of license revocation when the regulator determines that addressing the harm and imposing conditions can protect the public without automatically ending the license. The rules describe specific criteria for this option—often requiring that the licensee accepts responsibility, agrees to pay restitution (to victims or the state), and agrees to follow certain conditions or monitoring to prevent future violations. In that framework, a restitution order serves as a remedy that remedies harm and enforces accountability while allowing the licensee to continue practicing. This is why the statement “Yes, as described” is correct: the option exists, but only under the particular circumstances laid out in the regulation, not as a blanket or automatic consequence.

The situation allows a restitution order in place of license revocation when the regulator determines that addressing the harm and imposing conditions can protect the public without automatically ending the license. The rules describe specific criteria for this option—often requiring that the licensee accepts responsibility, agrees to pay restitution (to victims or the state), and agrees to follow certain conditions or monitoring to prevent future violations. In that framework, a restitution order serves as a remedy that remedies harm and enforces accountability while allowing the licensee to continue practicing.

This is why the statement “Yes, as described” is correct: the option exists, but only under the particular circumstances laid out in the regulation, not as a blanket or automatic consequence.